sml logo Dark Ages Re-Creation Company sml logo
Overview
Oct 12, 2015
Jun 20, 2015
Apr 25, 2015
May 11, 2013
May 27, 2012
Nov 5, 2011
Oct 9, 2011
July 28, 2011
June 11, 2011
Nov 6, 2010
Aug 21, 2010
June 12, 2010
Nov 7, 2009
Oct 11, 2009
May 30, 2009
Nov 8, 2008
Oct 12, 2008
Jun 14, 2008
Apr 13, 2008
Oct 27, 2007
Oct 8, 2007
Jun 10, 2007 - Excav.
Jun 9, 2007 - Second
Jun 9, 2007 - First
Nov 5, 2006
Sep 1-2, 2006
Jun 10, 2006
Jun 10, 2006 - Tools
Nov 4, 2005
Sep 1, 2005 - CanIron V
Jun 11, 2005
May 14, 2005 - OABA
Jan 14, 2005 - Consolid.
Oct 24, 2004
Jun 3, 2004
Jun 3, 2004 - Design
Jun 3, 2004 - Questions
May, 2003 - Analysis
May 2003
May 2002

Iron Smelt Vinderheima Oct 2008

Date: 12 Oct, 2008

Location: Vinderheima

See also: http://www.warehamforge.ca/ironsmelting/

Premise:

  1. Overall set up is a totally earth surrounded smelter at the end of a slot - with the layout similar to those at Hals
  2. Use a medium walled clay cobb furnace structure.
  3. Block in the location of the hand bellows, but use the electric blower for air
  4. Use a bellows plate construction
  5. Use blow tube arrangement for the tuyere (which can quickly be modified to our normal insert tuyere if required.
  6. The aim is for a 3 - 5 kg bloom. (Hals size in range of 15 x 15 x 10 cm)

Experiment Notes - Norse Short Shaft Smelter in a frame

Diameter:  25 cm Stack above Tuyure:  45 cm Tuyure Diameter:  1" (2.6 cm) I.D.
Tuyure Distance above floor:  20 cm Tuyure Angle:  20° Tuyure Penetration into stack (start/finish)  N/A

The Team:

Leader Neil Peterson / Darrell Markewitz
Staff Ken Cook
Recorder Darrell Markewitz
Strikers Neil Peterson / Ken Cook
Construction Ken Cook / Darrell Markewitz

Smelt_cd Reports of all of our iron smelting efforts along with more articles and information are available on the "Iron Smelting in the Viking Age" CD from the Wareham Forge.  Copies of the CD can be purchased here.
Smelt Totals
Total Charcoal 46 Kg Weight of Bloom 4.9 Kg Total Elapsed Time: 6:30
Total Ore 23 Kg (8 Kg Virginia Rock ore / 15 Kg Taconite) Weight of Slag: ?? Bloom Quality mild steel

Discussion:

When the original working area was laid out, it was designed to allow for two smelters to be installed side by side. The earth bank that defines the western edge of the working area was retained by a line of concrete blocks, which could be easily moved to make alterations. Two rail road ties were used to block in the 2 m x 2m overall size indicated at Hals. On the actual above ground sod construction, this would be a log crib. With the length of the ties actually a bit more than required (and lots of stones!) the rear dimension was set using a row of rocks. By removing three stacks of the retaining wall blocks, there is about the correct opening for the front V of a working area leading back to the smelter front wall. Measuring from the current work surface to the tops of the two rail ties, establishes about the correct height proposed for the Icelandic construction.

After about 6 hours work, the bank was cut back and concrete blocks used to secure the walls to create the V shape work area. The space between the V of the block walls is the length of a standard block (about 25 cm).

Constructing the Smelter:

The next task was to first cut a rough cylinder into the earth bank, then build the clay shaft of the furnace. As with past construction, the clay cobb was composed of commercial powdered potter's clay mixed with about 50 % by volume of chopped straw, cut to 5 - 8 cm lengths. A space for the tap arch was determined by framing it with a standard brick about (20 cm long x 10 high) As each course of clay cobb was built up, loose earth was hand packed into the irregular space between the exterior wall surface and the cut earth. To balance this inward force and stabilize the thinner walls, course sand was used to fill the interior space to the identical level. It was also hoped that the sand would help to wick off some of the moisture from the wet clay. As the cylinder reached the level of the working platform (about 65 cm total height) a ring of stones was placed to support the upper edge.

The last step in completing the working platform was to top off the surface with about 5 cm of clean course sand.

The bellows plate was made up of a 50 / 50 mix of powdered clay and shredded, dry horse manure. Replacing the straw with manure gives a finer texture to the finished plate. The plate measured 20 cm wide by 25 cm tall, overall 3 cm thick.

The structure was left to stabilize for a few hours, then the sand inside was scooped out. As the lower area was reached, the brick supporting the tap arch was carefully pulled out, allowing the balance of the sand to be cleared. The brick was then replaced, set so the holes through its center would lead into the shaft. At this point a very gentle split wood fire was started inside the shaft. This process of adding a handful of splits at a time would continue for several hours. At the end of the evening, a metal cover was placed on the open top of the shaft so the coals created would slowly bake dry the smelter over night.

The next morning the whole smelter shaft was found to be still warm to the touch, and was baked dry and hard. A layer of ash and fragments of unburned charcoal was found to a depth even with the tap arch. A dry wall saw was used to lay out a rectangle the same size as the bellows plate, and then that portion of the smelter wall was cut away. The supporting brick was removed from the tap arch so the ash from the drying fire could be scooped out.

The bellows plate was also dry and hard, and was found to have curled up slightly at its edges (from the aggressive drying over the fire). The plate was trimmed slightly to fit, then installed into the smelter. It was positioned so that it would sit flush with the inside smelter surface (thus slightly recessed on the outer face). Fresh clay was used to mortar in the plate to the smelter walls. There was some concern at that time because of the difference between the consistency between the dry surfaces and this fresh clay. It was expected that considerable shrinking and eventual peeling away of the joints might lead to problems latter on in the firing sequence. (Which did prove to be the case.)

Finally a hole was cut into the bellows plate. The position was determined from the earlier layout drawings, the centre roughly 25 cm above the base line. The size of this hole was 8 cm, sized to leave 1.5 cm clearance around the exterior diameter (at 5 cm) of the standard ceramic tubes used for tuyeres.

Setting Up for the Smelt:

As one of the objectives was to determine the work pattern (and problems) with the layout including a human powered bellows, the space for this equipment was determined by positioning the frame required to support a Norse style double bellows of suitable size. The space was then simulated with a full sized cut out in the same location. The standard electric blower was then use to provide the required air, with a flexible pipe attached to the normal T fitting. The working end consisted of one of the commercial ceramic tube tuyeres (2.5 cm interior diameter). The measured angle on the air pipe was 15 degrees down. The gap between the tip of the air pipe and the surface of the bellows plate was established by sound (adjusting for the loudest and 'throaty-est' roar). Once this was established, the air pipe was wired into place on the wooden frame. The resulting gap was about 3 - 4 cm determined with an air flow estimated at 740 litres per minute.

As with past smelts, a preheat phase using split wood was applied first. This was done using natural draft for one hour and ten minutes, followed by a brief period with gentle air flow from the blower supplied. No specific base was set for the furnace, the ash and mostly consumed charcoal from the preheat phase was left in place. (The normal practice is to use a layer of charcoal fines to define a floor for the furnace at a measured distance below the tuyere.) The total preheat was one hour and 18 minutes, at this point the smelter was filled with rough charcoal and a full air blast was started. The furnace would require about 45 minutes operation to completely ignite the working column to the top.

Main Smelt Sequence:

At the start of main sequence the consumption rate was about 13 minutes per standard bucket (measured at 1.85 kg), so charging with ore was started.

For this smelt, it was decided to use a combination of the remaining industrial taconite plus the poor quality Virginia rock ore. The rock ore was considered to be a bit low in iron content, and so was added first to establish a working slag bowl. Additions were measured 'by the scoop', with the actual weights determined mathematically later. Larger charges were used right from the start, being 4 scoops (1.1 kg total) within each bucket of charcoal. After a total of about 8 kg of the rock ore was added, charges were switched to the much higher iron content taconite. (Both materials had been roasted and crushed to the normal 'rice to half pea' size.)

Just about the point were the switch was being made to the second ore type, problems were starting to be encountered with the function of the blow hole air system.

After the addition of roughly the first 8 kg of ore, (about 6 kg fallen to tuyere level) the top of the slag bowl could be easily seen just below the bottom edge of the blow hole. Several attempts were made to gather excess slag on to a metal rod to lower the level. This met with limited effect, largely due to limited skill and experience of the operators. A film of hardened slag could be seen developing to the left edge of the blow hole. Clearly the slag was starting on its way to blocking the air flow. Unfortunately, an especially large gather of slag slid off the rod right at the hole's mouth, completely blocking the blast. Immediately, the temperature in the whole furnace began to plummet. With some frantic activity, that slag was shoved into the centre of the furnace, and the ceramic tube was pushed through the bellows plate to convert the smelter into an insert tuyere type.

This effectively halted two of the primary objectives of the experiment (use of bellows plate and blow hole combination), but did recover the furnace temperatures back up to correct operating levels. After about 20 minutes the burning rate had returned to the 13 minutes per charge established before this disaster, and ore charges were resumed.

At this point the air pipe system was hung from an overhead support with wire so the bellows frame could be removed out the way. It was then possible to open the tap arch and clear the wood ash from underneath the slag bowl. Almost immediately, the furnace began self tapping with the typical late stage dark black, solid and fluid slag.

The charges of taconite were denser than the earlier rock ore, with 1.6 kg per bucket being added roughly every 13 minutes for the balance of the smelt (roughly 1 : 1), an additional 15 kg.

When the last ore was added, the remainder of a charcoal bucket was used to cover it, and the furnace taken straight into the burn down phase. The extraction started with an attempt to pull from the top. The charcoal was allowed to burn down to quite close to the top of the slag bowl. For this reason, the debris field was quite limited on the upper working platform. Neil started the extraction process, but was having some problems assessing just where the bloom had formed and for that reason (plus more limited experience) had considerable problems. The initial compaction and loosing of the bloom with the thumper in place inside the smelter was therefore not as effective as might have been desired. Through this effort, the temperature inside the furnace was dropping, and the slag mass slowly congealing. Eventually it proved necessary to switch to a bottom exaction through the tap arch. By the time the bloom was eventually pulled from the smelter, it was in fact too cold to undertake any significant consolidation. It was possible to knock free the loose 'mother' and shape it to a rough brick shape.

The next morning, the tools were cleared away and a closer look was taken of our working area. The layer of clean sand that had been deposited over the upper platform and to the front of the smelter slot made assessing working patterns easier. - There was very little debris of any kind deposited on the upper working platform. This was due partially to the more complete burn down to the top of the slag bowl than had been done in the past. This was not entirely intentional, but more a result of a longer time getting organized by a less experienced operator who started the extraction process. Less partially consumed charcoal remained to be scooped away, also leaving a higher percentage of 'slag drips' mixed in with that material.

Conclusions:

Overall set up
It was clear that working from the top platform did not pose any significant problems during the main smelt sequence. Our standard has been both charcoal bucket and ore scoop on long handles. this done to keep hands out of the hot exhaust gasses at the top of the smelter. It would have been easy enough to stand on the ground beside a built up sod in frame structure and make the charges. This is thought more likely than working from the top of the platform, as to do this would make it difficult to fill the buckets of charcoal (specifically) from the large pile of fuel required for a smelt. Without a handle on the bucket, it would be necessary to have another worker pass up each bucket, or the one adding charges to constantly hop on and off the structure.

A clear increase in difficulty was noted when it came to attempting make a top extraction of the bloom while working on top of the platform. Normally the body of the smelter protects the lower half of the worker, who is reaching down to a level roughly at the ankle. On top of the platform, now the reach to the slag bowl is extended a further 60 cm lower, while the entire body is exposed to the heat of the furnace. What eventually happened is our team was working while kneeling so they could reach the bottom of the furnace. This clearly did not allow for the same amount of force or leverage to be available.
Use a medium walled clay cobb
There were no significant problems encountered with the change from a 8 cm to a 5 cm wall thickness built of straw and clay cobb. The smelter liner was found to be more fragile with the thinner walls. The use of the bellows plate largely reduced erosion of the walls, so no significant reduction of thickness from the high temperatures was observed. With more care taken to reduce damage on extraction, it is expected that the 5 cm walls would have withstood at least one more firing. More experimentation should be undertaken here. It is expected that the 3 cm wall thickness will experience significant cracking and prove too fragile to survive the extraction process without significant repairs. Replacing the chopped straw with dry horse manure is also suggested for the 3 cm thickness.
Location of the hand bellows
The primary problem here was the size and position of the frame supporting the bellows within the working slot. Although it was relatively easy to see the bellows plate and blow hole, the direct access to this area was limited to standing along the edge of the frame. This made it more difficult to attempt any manipulation of the developing slag bowl through the blow hole. (This was part of the reason for the blockage encountered.)

The tap arch itself proved totally impossible to access. It might have been possible to lay down under the bellows frame, with a bellows operator straddling that worker while pumping continued. This was just not considered practical. With no access to the tap arch, easy control of the slag volumes was just not possible.

For both these reasons, it is suggested that it would be more likely that the bellows would be hung from extensions off the timber structure of the smelter than supported on a separate frame. Another possibility is that the bellows on its frame would be moved some distance back (and to the side?) of the smelter structure, and some type of air pipe be used to channel air to the tuyere. This could easily be fabricated from a tube of heavy leather or a hollowed out length of wooden branch. In any case, a bellows located inside the working slot would certainly have to be removed if a bottom (front) extraction method was to be undertaken. Our normal practice has been to continue with gentle air during extraction, this to keep the slag from solidifying around the bloom. This would be impossible with a frame mounted bellows located in the working slot. Extremely fast work would be required to pry the hot bloom out of the hardening slag. It is most likely that the end result would be more damage to the lower front wall of the smelter itself. The continuing air blast also makes it possible to recharge the smelter to use it as a giant forge for re-heating the bloom after the initial compaction. This allows for multiple working sessions for consolidation and cutting. A frame mounted bellows would have to be constantly moved in and out of the work space to allow for this.
Use a bellows plate construction & Use blow tube arrangement for the tuyere
It was clear that the team needs more experience working with this type of furnace set up. In itself, the bellows plate was found to work extremely well. The thinner material did in fact withstand the higher temperatures surrounding the air blast quite effectively. Leakage around the plate was due to clay shrinkage, as the body of the smelter had been baked dry before the plate was installed. Fitting the plate while the body of the smelter is still damp is expected to greatly reduce (if not totally eliminate) this effect.

The blow hole arrangement proved to be more of a problem. It was clear that the system was working correctly for the first portion of the smelt sequence. Consumption rates were slightly reduced from those seen with the insert tuyere, but still within what was considered the effective range. (A rate of between 6 - 12 minutes per 2 kg charcoal is sought, for this experiment the rate averaged 13 minutes per charge.)

Problems were encountered as the slag bowl began to reach the level of the air hole, Attempts to clear the hole were compounded by the restricted access because of the bellows frame combined with the lack of experience on the part of the operators with this type of air system. Modification of the air tube and adapting the air hole to correctly fit should be made (in line with suggestions by Michael Nissen)

The production aim for this experiment was for a 3 - 5 kg bloom, similar to those suggested for Hals (size in range of 15 x 15 x 10 cm). Despite the near disaster of the blocked air hole, the team was able to apply past experience to salvage the smelt, producing a 4.9 kg bloom.

Plan View showing construction details and working areas. Cut out for the smelter Third layer of the smelter going in Bellows plate
Test bellows in place New style air system View from under the bellows Cracks around the bellows plates
Beginning of a blockage Smelter insides A better view Very high slag level
Collecting a gather Smelter after a gather Puntil with slag Another gather
Working the bloom Working the bloom Working the bloom Finished bloom
 
Finished bloom Edge of bellows plate Edge of bellows plate  


CLOCK ELAPSED EVENT AIR     CHARCOAL     ORE    
            UNIT COUNT TOTAL UNIT COUNT TOTAL
      gage LpM P bucket   kg scoop   kg
                1.85     note
12:00   start wood splints pre-heat                  
13:10 1:10 gentle air applied   *400*              
13:18 1:18 full with rough charcoal 90 ? 740 ? 4 4 4 7.40      
                       
13:35 :17         1 5 9.25      
13:48 :13         1 6 11.10      
14:02 :14         1 7 12.95      
14:03   first ore addition - Virginia Rock                  
14:15 :13         1 8 14.80 4 4 1.1
14:30 0:15         1 9 16.65 4 8 2.2
14:43 0:13 temp reading at 2575 F ?       1 10 18.50 4 12 3.3
15:08 ?   missed measurement? 77 625   1 11 20.35 8 20 5.5
15:18 0:10 ? adjust air       1 12 22.20 4 24 6.6
15:31 0:13         1 13 24.05 4 28 7.7
15:42 0:11 mixed 1 rock / 3 taconite       1 14 25.90 4 32 9.17
15:55 0:13         1 15 27.75 4 36 10.64
16:10 0:15         1 16 29.60 4 40 12.11
16:23 0:13 all taconite       1 17 31.45 2 42 12.91
    switch to insert tuyere @ - 10 full'                
16:31   heat recovery       1 18 33.30      
16:49 0:18         1 19 35.15 2 44 13.71
17:01 0:12         1 20 37.00 4 48 15.31
17:14 0:13         1 21 38.85 4 52 16.91
17:28 0:14         1 22 40.70 4 56 18.51
17:43 0:15         1 23 42.55 4 60 20.11
17:58 0:15         1 24 44.40 4 64 21.71
18:10 0:12         1 25 46.25 3 67 22.91
                       
  NOTE Virginia Rock (poor) per scoop 275 gm              
    Taconite per scoop 400 gm              
                       
    Total TIME (less burn down) 6 1/2 hours              
    Total CHARCOAL 46 kg              
    Total ORE 23 kg              
                       
    Total BLOOM 4.9 kg              
    Total Yield 18 %              


Smelt_cd Reports of all of our iron smelting efforts along with more articles and information are available on the "Iron Smelting in the Viking Age" CD from the Wareham Forge.  Copies of the CD can be purchased here.
      Updated: 7 Dec, 2008
Text © Darrell Markewitz, 2008   Photographs © Darrell Markewitz   Copyright details
Contact us